A conflict has flared up around the final games of the BBL. Now Ulm reacts to the statement of the BBL.
First Ratiopharm Ulm complained about the rejected reorganization of the final games about the behavior of the Basketball Bundesliga, after which the BBL rejected the criticism, now the club is on the train again.
“Both in the processes described and in terms of the chronology, the representation does not correspond to the facts,” the Ulm said on Tuesday in response to a statement by the league.
It is the next, but probably at least for the time being, the last advance in the ongoing dispute, Ulm announced that it “no longer commented on the topic during the ongoing final series”. However, one reserves the right to “make our position clear after the end of the season and to prove it with corresponding facts”.
Ulm and BBl in the clinch
On Sunday, Ulm had announced that the BBL rejected an application for the repeated fourth and fifth part in the playoff final against Bayern Munich. The background to this request was the possible participation of the Ulm Talente Noa Essengue and Ben Saraf on the NBA-draft, which would collide with these games.
Because of the criticism on Monday, the BBL showed its point of view that the league must “always move as part of the game regulations applicable to all clubs,” it said in a statement.
“After the two clubs could not agree in the current case”, it was at the discretion of the league whether there was “relocation for” important reason “”, the statement was in the statement. This was not the case – according to this, the BBL’s decision to reject the application reflects the “spirit of the competition, as the clubs defined it in the valid game regulations”.
There were also conciliatory tones. The BBL recognizes “the efforts and successes of Ratiopharm Ulm in the development of young players,” it said. With regard to future conflicts of interest, a conference with the clubs should have a discussion and vote.
A conflict has erupted around the BBL Final Games. Now ulm is reacting to the bbl’s statement.
First, ratiopharm ulm complained about the behavior of the basketball bundesliga regarding the rejected rescheduling of the final games, then the bbl rejected the criticism, now it is the club’s turn again.
“The representation does not correspond to the facts, Either in Terms of the Descred Processes or the Chronology,” Ulm Announced on Tuesday in response to a statement from the League.
It is the next, but probably at least for the time Being, The Last Advance in the Ongoing Dispute. Ulm Announced that it would “No Longer Comment on the Matter During the Ongoing Final Series.” However, they reserve the right to “make our position clear after the end of the end of the season and to support it with corresponding facts.”
Ulm and BBl in a clinch
On Sunday, Ulm Announced That The BBl Had Rejected a Request to Reschedule A Possible Fourth and Fifth Game In The Playoff Final Against Bayern Munich. The background to this Request was the possible Participation of Ulm Talents Noa Essengue and Ben Saraf in the NBA Draft, which would Clash with these games.
The BBL Presented Its Point of View on Monday Due to the Criticism, Sting That The League Must “Always Operates Within The Framework Of The Game Regulation Applicable to All Clubs,” According to a Statement.
“After the Two Clubs Were Undle to Agree in the Current Case,” It is at the discretion of the League Whether a “Postponement of the Game for ‘Important Reasons'” Exist, The Statement Said. This was not the Case – Accordingly, The BBL’s Decision to Reject the Request Reflects the “Spirit of Competition as Definent by the Clubs In The Valid Game Regulations.”
So there are conciliatory tons. The BBL Recognits “Ratiopharm Ulm’s EFFORTS AND SUCCESSES in the Development of Young Players,” It Said. With Regard to Future Conflicts of Interest, there should be a discussion and vote at a conference with the clubs.